{"id":2775,"date":"2021-07-20T21:08:29","date_gmt":"2021-07-20T21:08:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cruch.saargo.com\/?page_id=2775"},"modified":"2021-08-04T22:18:37","modified_gmt":"2021-08-04T22:18:37","slug":"resultados-ence-2018","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cruch.saargo.com\/en\/pregrado-y-sellos-cruch\/ence\/resultados-ence-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"ENCE 2018 Results"},"content":{"rendered":"

ENCE 2018<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>

The ENCE 2018 survey considered five CRUCH universities: the Pontificia Universidad Cat\u00f3lica de Chile, the Universidad de Chile, the Universidad de Valpara\u00edso, the Universidad de Playa Ancha and the Universidad Cat\u00f3lica de Temuco. In total, 7,383 students from the 2018 cohort (first year) and from the 2015 cohort (fourth year) completed the survey, who are pursuing careers in the areas of Administration and Commerce, Agriculture, Art and Architecture, Sciences, Social Sciences, Law, Education, General Studies, Humanities, Health and Technology.<\/p>

The questionnaire included 90 items (questions) and considers 9 evaluation dimensions, which cover various aspects associated with the student experience and learning. On the other hand, it collects descriptive information on the personal and socioeconomic characterization of the students, together with information on academic results and their perceptions about the use of time, expectations and achievements; together with evidence on certain practices considered "High Impact".<\/p><\/div><\/div>

Scheme of the ENCE 2018 Questionnaire<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

CHARACTERIZATION<\/h3>\n

Institution \/ Program
\nAge \/ Sex
\nEM background
\nAdmission background
\nPersonal information
\nHousehold data
\nSocioeconomic data
\nStudent benefits\n<\/p>\n

PERCEPTIONS<\/h3>\n

Hour dedication
\nWorkload
\nExpectations\n<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>

DIMENSION OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT<\/h3>\n

1. Higher order learning
\n2. Learning strategies
\n3. Quantitative reasoning
\n4. Collaborative learning
\n5. Interaction with another-diversity
\n6. Student-teacher interaction
\n7. Effective teaching practices
\n8. Quality of interactions
\n9. Institutional support\n<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>
<\/div>

RESULTS<\/h3>\n

Rating - Notes
\nCompared Notes
\nApproval mug
\n(Retention, Exit Time)
\nSemester performance\n<\/p>\n

PERCEPTIONS<\/h3>\n

Competency Achievements
\nGraduate perspective
\nUniversitary experience\n<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

<\/div>

HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES<\/h3>\n

Early professional internships
\nStudent participation - volunteering
\nStudy groups \/ learning communities
\nCollaboration in research projects
\n+ Other exploratory\n<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

ENCE 2018 results available here<\/a><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

ENCE project<\/p><\/div><\/div>